Home
Webmasters, please Mirror this Site!

DISCLAIMER:  This is a free speech populist website and is not affiliated with any organization or any group directly involved with E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company, Inc. This website is not legally or financially associated with SCV, SLRC or any other group, organization or corporation.  
"All that's necessary for the forces of evil to win in the world is for enough good men to do nothing." - Edmund Burke.

PLEASE BOOKMARK THIS WEBSITE AND COME BACK OFTEN FOR UPDATES.

 
Please read Michael A. Masters' article which appeared in the March/April 2004 Southern Mercury.  
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Hear Our Prayers, O God,
 
We raise our voice to you through this worldwide media to ask for your intercession. As you stood by young David when he went against mighty Goliath, we beseech you and your messengers to impart wisdom and surround us with your light and protection.  
 
We learned from the Torah and Christian Bible and have taken our stand against dark forces, homosexual lifestyle supported and mandated by Goliath, DuPont Corporation. The stench of hypocrisy and homosexual abomination extends to the heavens and we know it is not acceptable in your moral teachings or in our morals principles. DuPont took vile actions against our hallowed emblem of morality, your Cross of St. Andrew, and called it a "despicable symbol." Their words are blasphemy against the apostle St. Andrew and the church and righteous men, for the emblem represents a position of human conviction, principles and morality that men died to defend from early days.
 
O God, we therefore humbly ask your messengers of light to travel down the road from where we stand in protest and enter the DuPont Plant.  Intercede in our conflict and touch the souls within the buildings.  Intercede and touch the DuPont managers and their families.  Intercede and touch their money profits.  Intercede and touch the souls of homosexual B-GLAD.  Intercede and touch DuPont lawyers, that cause unrelenting hurtful actions against moral men, their wives and children.
 
We ask a special blessing on DuPont Plant Manager, Mr. Rick L. Hodge that he will have ears to hear and eyes to see the hypocrisy and degradation within his new management arena. Let him not be guilty of the sin of omission. And give him the fortitude - the strength and firmness of mind to encounter the dangers associated  with his stand for moral Christian principles.
 
We ask you to hear the prayer.
 
~~~~~~~~~~~
 
DuPont Corporation has a policy of not allowing employees to view obscene websites. DuPont has a zero tolerance consequence policy and has fired several employees after they were accused of clicking on and viewing an obscene website. 
 
DuPont Corporation encourages and supports internal network organization B-GLAD - Bisexual, Gays, Lesbians, Transgendered and Allies at DuPont. There are numerous computer links from the "at DuPont" site to obscene sites, viewers are encouraged to go there, and it is supported by DuPont. In effect, DuPont is supporting obscene websites but if you view them they will fire you. Obscene sites, follow the links: http://www.dupontbglad.com/Links/links.html
 
                  ...........
 
May 15, 2004 -- We are told in depth research into the business and political agenda of DuPont, a worldwide, multinational corporation, and its relationship to a New World agenda of United Nations and homosexual political movement lifestyle is complete.  We are told this information will be posted on other websites and written reports will be made available and distributed in other American cities.    
 

Auras around the Southern Cross and Star of David
Dupont7 vigil 5/13/04-Auras around Southern Cross/Star of David

Thousands of Hebrew men were genetically the Star of David and carried their beloved Southern Flag into battle and to their deaths.  DuPont, through its actions, cursed and spit on those Hebrew men and their flag.  We honor Richmond boy, Isaac Levy,  for his service and death at 21 years old in Petersburg, Va.  Through its actions, DuPont has deliberately spit on and cast out teachings of Jesus the Christ, Judeo-Christian religions, Apostle St. Andrew, the Cross of St. Andrew emblem and, in its place, embraced the homosexual "Rainbow flag" emblem, teachings and principles, men having anal intercourse with men, women having sex with women, and other sorts of perversions condemned by all respectful religious teachings around the world.  If you are employed by DuPont and disagree with their mandates, you will be ordered and required to attend "A Matter of Respect" (AMOR) training to change your thinking as in George Orwell's futuristic book depicting Big Brother - 1984. His name might have been Winston Smith ... a devout Mormon employee at DuPont.  He was reprimanded for thoughtcrime.  He criticized DuPont's homosexual organization B-GLAD and was ordered to undergo AMOR thought modification class to correct his disrespectful behavior.
 
 memsof.gif (886
                  bytes)lamed2.gif (898 bytes)vuv.gif (860 bytes)ayin.gif
                  (920 bytes) resh.gif (875 bytes)koph.gif (890 bytes)zayin.gif
                  (866 bytes)lamed1.gif (892 bytes)
To Eternal Memory

resh.gif (875 bytes)vuv.gif (860 bytes)ches.gif (898 bytes)beis.gif
                  (897 bytes)heh.gif (892 bytes) kuph.gif (898 bytes)yod.gif
                  (852 bytes)daled.gif (886 bytes)tzadi.gif (909 bytes)heh.gif (892 bytes) yod.gif (852 bytes)heh.gif (892 bytes)yod.gif
                  (852 bytes)
The Righteous Youth
beis.gif (897 bytes)kuph.gif (898
                  bytes)ayin.gif (920 bytes)yod.gif (852 bytes) 'resh.gif
                  (875 bytes) langenon.gif (875 bytes)beis.gif (897 bytes) kuph.gif
                  (898 bytes)ches.gif (898 bytes)tzadi.gif (909 bytes)yod.gif (852 bytes)

Isaac the son of Jacob
gimel.gif (878 bytes)resh.gif (875 bytes)vuv.gif
                  (860 bytes)beis.gif (897 bytes)samach.gif (887 bytes)resh.gif (875 bytes)tes.gif (911 bytes)peh.gif (905 bytes) tav.gif (902 bytes)vuv.gif
                  (860 bytes)mem.gif (913 bytes)ches.gif (898 bytes)lamed2.gif
                  (898 bytes)mem.gif (913 bytes)beis.gif (897 bytes) tav.gif
                  (902 bytes)mem.gif (913 bytes)
Killed at the Battle of Petersburg
memsof.gif (886 bytes)ches.gif
                  (898 bytes)non.gif (877 bytes)mem.gif (913 bytes) shin.gif
                  (933 bytes)daled.gif (886 bytes)ches.gif (898 bytes)lamed2.gif
                  (898 bytes) memsof.gif (886 bytes)yod.gif (852 bytes)mem.gif
                  (913 bytes)yod.gif (852 bytes) tes.gif (911 bytes)"yod.gif
                  (852 bytes) 'aleph.gif (916 bytes) memsof.gif (886 bytes)vuv.gif (860 bytes)yod.gif (852 bytes)beis.gif (897 bytes)
On the First Day, 19th of the Month of Av
kuph.gif
                  (898 bytes)peh.gif (905 bytes)lamed1.gif (892 bytes) daled.gif (886 bytes)koph.gif (890 bytes)resh.gif (875
                  bytes)tav.gif (902 bytes) tav.gif (902 bytes)non.gif
                  (877 bytes)shin.gif (933 bytes)
In the Year 5624
.heh.gif (892 bytes).beis.gif (897 bytes).tzadi.gif (909 bytes).non.gif (877 bytes).tav.gif
                  (902 bytes)
May His Soul be Bound up in the Bond of Eternity
resh.gif (875 bytes)vuv.gif (860
                  bytes)aleph.gif (916 bytes)vuv.gif (860 bytes)
langekoph.gif (878 bytes)lamed2.gif (898 bytes)vuv.gif
                  (860 bytes)heh.gif (892 bytes) ayin.gif (920 bytes)gimel.gif
                  (878 bytes)non.gif (877 bytes) resh.gif (875 bytes)vuv.gif
                  (860 bytes)aleph.gif (916 bytes)koph.gif (890 bytes) memsof.gif
                  (886 bytes)yod.gif (852 bytes)kuph.gif (898 bytes)yod.gif
                  (852 bytes)daled.gif (886 bytes)tzadi.gif (909 bytes) ches.gif (898 bytes)resh.gif (875 bytes)vuv.gif (860 bytes)aleph.gif (916 bytes)vuv.gif
                  (860 bytes)
memsof.gif (886 bytes)vuv.gif (860 bytes)yod.gif
                  (852 bytes)heh.gif (892 bytes) langenon.gif (875 bytes)vuv.gif (860 bytes)koph.gif (890 bytes)non.gif (877 bytes) daled.gif
                  (886 bytes)ayin.gif (920 bytes)

In Memory of Isaac J.
beloved son of
Jacob A. & Martha Levy
who fell in battle
in front of Petersburg Va.
Sunday, August 21st, 1864
Age 21 yrs.--11 mos. & 3 days
May his soul rest in peace
"The Faith of the Religious is
Like the Brilliant Light that
Shineth More and More Bright
Until the Height of the Day"

"Gusta brought me the sad news of the death of Isaac Levy, a fine young soldier, killed in the trenches near Petersburg. He & his brother Ezekiel Levy have observed their religion faithfully, ever since they have been in the army, never even eating forbidden food. He leaves a devoted father & mother brothers & sisters to mourn his loss." Emma Mordecai, diary, Aug. 24, 1864.

"Went to see Mrs. Levy whose son Isaac was killed near Petersbg. on Sunday 21st. Was greatly interested in my visit to the family. Isaac was an example to all young men of any faith--to those of his own most especially. A true Israelite without guile--a soldier of the Lord & a soldier of the South. A noble patriot. His parents & sisters mourn for him as those mourn who while full of love, are also full of Faith and Hope and submission. If all our people were like that family, we would already arise & shine for our light would have come." Emma Mordecai, diary, Aug. 30, 1864

 

And a picture says a thousand words!
The 40,000 member SCV and all the sons and daughters of the south honored the martyred
DuPont 7 men with a special plaque for their suffering and steadfast stand against tyranny.

 

"IT IS SO ORDERED." From the 1-30-04 hearing: JUDGE HUDSON SAID: " I am not going to sanction you for the Rule 83, but you are reprimanded for it." When the papers arrived from Judge Hudson he ignored his court statement and ordered sanctions against Attorney Lyons in the amount of $10,000.00.
 
Judge Hudson has also ordered that the Dupont 7 men pay $26,100.00 of their employer's attorneys fees and $1,450.00 in expenses, as follows: 
Kevin L. Chaplin is HEREBY ORDERED to pay $5,500.00; James P. Jones is HEREBY ORDERED to pay $3,500.00; Robert C. Lewis is HEREBY ORDERED to pay $3,500.00; Marvin L. Oliver is HEREBY ORDERED to pay $2,500.00; Lynn E. Ritenour is HEREBY ORDERED to pay $5,000.00; David Rowlette is HEREBY ORDERED to pay $4,000.00; 
Stephen Turley is HEREBY ORDERED to pay $3,550.00. 
 
May 15, 2004 --- OUR COMMENT:
 
Federal Judge Henry Hudson and DuPont Corporation said the DuPont 7 charges are frivolous and refused to listen to the case. "The case is frivolous and without merit," they said.
 
Eight hard working men stood in Federal Court before Judge Hudson - "I will not listen to you but I fine you $37,550.00 for bringing the case to my court," so acted Judge Henry Hudson.
 
Judge Hudson ordered the men to labor and turn over their $37,550.00 earnings to DuPont - a $77 Billion dollar transnational corporation, without even hearing the case.
 
Federal judges sit on the bench with their dignity, in their black robes, order and demand respect from the people under penalty of their interpretation of law.  Increasing numbers of citizens clearly see justice is purchased by the wealthy.
 
.:*~*:._.:*~*:._.:*~*:.
 
A Message for DuPont and for You (Who could be a "Committee of One"):
 
In 1979, the following lesson was broadcast over the Presbyterian  Fine Arts Station of Union Theological Seminary, in Richmond, Va., WRFK-fm:

We take pleasure in presenting The Art of Living, in cooperation with the National Council of the Churches of Christ. Our speaker today is Dr. Theodore Parker Farris, Rector of the Trinity Church of Boston. Today's topic: The Water Levels of Life.

Dr. Farris:

Not long after I had become the Rector of Trinity Church in Boston, the Senior Warden gave me a list of committees and the names of the men who served on them. The first one, as you might imagine, was the Finance Committee, then there was the Budget Committee, the Buildings and Grounds Committee, the Nominating Committee, the Long Range Planning Committee, the Camp Committee, many others, and by the end of the list was the Committee in Charge of Water Levels. I was on familiar ground until I got to that point.

I had been the minister of one other church before I went to Boston and I knew something about the committees needed to run a church. I said to one of the men, "What in the world is the Committee in Charge of Water Levels?" He said, "The place where the church stands is called the Back Bay." I knew that, of course. It was once a real bay and where we now stand was water.

About the middle of the 19th century, the Bostonians had the imagination and the ingenuity to fill in the bay. It was an enormous undertaking. All the city around Trinity Church is made land and the water is only a few feet under the sidewalk. Trinity Church was built in 1877 and it rests on 4,500 wooden piles. You know as well as I know that wood doesn't rot so long as it's kept in water. Once let the air get to it and thats the end of the wood. The Committee in Charge of Water Levels, therefore, is responsible for seeing that the water is kept at a level high enough to protect the piles and keep them from rotting. In the cellar of the church there are wells, they look like manholes. And every week someone takes the reading of the water level.

There have been times when the water level has gone down. When the new buildings around Copley Square were being built, water had to be pumped out of the area so that the concrete barge on which the new buildings stand could be built. So water had to be pumped back into the foundations of Trinity Church to keep the water level high enough to protect the old wooden piles. The Committee watches the water level. This, as you may guess, is an allegory, not a parable but an allegory. The wooden piles are the foundations upon which our society is built, the water is the moral and spiritual environment which keep the foundations from rotting. If the level of our moral and spiritual life falls below a certain point, the foundations of our society will begin to crumble and will eventually fall.

My question is if we could take readings of these water levels, the water levels of our moral and spiritual life, what would they be? There isn't any possible way of doing it, of course, so your guess is as good as mine. But I have a feeling that the level at the present moment is too low for safety.

Links endorsed by DuPont B-GLAD (click on them!): Anne Lawrence M.D.  The Advocate #1  The Advocate #2  The Washington Blade   Gay Russia

Begin with our homes. What do you think about the water level there? They are long on freedom and short on discipline, long on standards of living and short on standards of value, long on independence and short on happiness. I am amazed how few are really happy homes. Sometimes people in them are either bored or discontented with their lot, and some are so oppressed by the emptiness of life that nothing gives them any sparkle at all. I know, of course, that there are many homes not like this, I see hundreds of them. But there are too many that are.

Our schools are long on technical training and short, by and large, on the basic discipline which gives a person not only an education but a character. Whatever you want to call it, it is the stuff a man is made of which makes him able to face situations he has to meet in life. Our schools are well-prepared to give him an education which provides him with a certain amount of knowledge, but not often those basic disciplines which help him build a mature character so he can handle well whatever happens to him.

Sometimes our hospitals are long on scientific research, but short on the human approach to the patient.

Our business houses are long on promotion and public relations. They can create an image to their liking of almost anything, but too often they are short on what we call integrity. They can create an image, but they seldom ask seriously what the image is about or whether it is true, or whether it really represents what they are trying to sell. They are long on expense accounts and short on accountability.

Perhaps I am biased about this, as perhaps it is because I don't see enough people. But it seems to be increasingly plain that there are fewer and fewer people who rejoice in making something well just for the sake of making it. In other words, once again, we are long on cleverness, but short on craftsmanship.

If this is anything like a fair reading of the present water level, if you agree that the water level is too low for comfort, what can we do about it? How can we raise those water levels? I know my own temptation when I think about these things is to say, "What can I do, only one person, to resist such a tide as this? I am helpless." But I know from history and from my own experience that a relatively few people can do a great deal indirectly, if not directly. When I stop to think about it I know that I can do a great deal more than I am likely to think I can.

Never underestimate the power of a woman, someone once said. Never doubt the power of one determined, dedicated individual. One of the people I follow closely is Herbert Butterfield, Professor of History at Cambridge University in England. He is a Methodist layman and all his writing must be read in the light of his Christian faith. In his book, Christianity, Diplomacy and War, he writes this:

"A comparatively small number of communists possessing initially no measurable degree of power achieved in the thirty years after 1917 such a transformation of the globe as has rarely been equaled in magnitude or in thoroughness or in extent they achieved far more than all the armies of the Kaiser and the Tsar or the British and Austrian and Hungarian empires and of the United States put together." 

All those people who are driven to pessimism and paralysis by the ideal that nothing can be affected on this earth save by numbers and powers may take comfort therefore from this exhilarating example. And then comes this line:

"Given the required intensity and intenseness, a comparatively few Christians could alter the course of history as powerfully as the communists have done." 

It is worth remembering, especially when you feel hopelessly outnumbered, that many of the great things in the world have been started by relatively few people.

You know how many people came over on the Mayflower? Since this was one of the breeding grounds of the democratic experiment, it is worth knowing how many people were involved in that chapter of its story. There were about 100. And how many signed the Mayflower Compact? 41.

I don't know whether you have had any experience with Alcoholic's Anonymous, but you must have heard about it. That group has saved more individuals from one particular branch of hell than any other group I know. Do you know how it started? One man started it. Bill Wilson. Of course, there were many influences in his life all converging together at one strategic point, but one man started the movement that has saved thousands from alcoholic hell.

One other thing I know is that if the level of our moral and spiritual life is raised, it will be done by people who are not trying to do it. That may not make much sense to you at the moment, but if you stop to think about it you will see, I think, that the people who have often made the biggest dent on the world for good have invariably been engaged in doing something else. Most historians would say that John Wesley saved England from a violent industrial revolution. He didn't have any idea that he was doing it. He was drawing people to the mercy seat. Saint Paul, historians say, changed the course of Western Europe. He didn't have any ideal he was doing it. He was going up and down the civilized world preaching Christ crucified.

In the long run, the people who lift the level of this world are the ones who have their eyes on something beyond the immediate thing. They are not the reformers, they are not the do-gooders, almost never. They are the people who are lit by a light from another world which shines without their knowing it. And they do, or often quite unconsciously, something that changes the climate of the world they live in. Again, I quote Herbert Butterfield, "The profoundest effects in our civilization have been produced by people who were not thinking of effecting the course of human affairs at the mundane level. They have come as unanticipated byproducts of lives that have really been intent on spiritual things. "

What do you think about all of this? What do you think about the water level of your own life? What do you think about your influence and what it is on the lives of people around you? Do you care whether our society stands or falls? Perhaps you don't. But I think you do. Will you make yourself a "Committee of One" to do something with yourself so that wherever you go there may be a chance that the level of life is lifted, imperceptibly perhaps, but lifted nonetheless?

.:*~*:._.:*~*:._.:*~*:.

Paper, Allied-Industrial, Chemical, and Energy Workers International Union (PACE) is getting organized!
 

DuPont CEO Charles Holliday w/U.N. Sec. Gen. Kofi
DuPont CEO Charles Holliday w/U.N. Sec. Gen. Kofi Annan

Jan. 22, 2004 Citing three federal rulings against the DuPont Co. for labor law violations, the company's second-largest union thinks it's time to air grievances before the United Nations.  The Paper, Allied-Industrial, Chemical, and Energy Workers International Union says the company has bargained in bad faith and opposes the right of workers to unionize. The union says that violates the U.N.'s Global Compact, which DuPont signed in 2001. As a result, it wants the company removed from the Compact. DuPont disagrees with the union's views. U.N. Secretary General Kofi Annan has vouched for the company's commitment to the Global Compact, and in a speech last October called DuPont chief executive Charles O. Holliday Jr. "a good friend of the United Nations."
 
December 8, 2003--In a statement released today, Boyd Young, president of the Paper, Allied-Industrial, Chemical, and Energy Workers International Union (PACE), expressed concern over DuPonts announcement that it would slash jobs in the U.S. and Western Europe and shift operations to China and Eastern Europe. PACE currently represents 2,000 workers in six DuPont facilities.  I believe that DuPonts union and non-union employees will see this announcement as just another example of this companys disregard for the thousands of workers and their communities who built this company, said Young.  We will certainly be challenging this restructuring plan, and believe DuPont workers understand that this is a global challenge requiring greater worker power. No one can fight this alone.  To date, DuPont has invested a total of $700 million in China and built 23 solely invested or joint-venture facilities there.  The company employs 3,000 Chinese workers.  Other U.S. and Western European chemical companies are also investing heavily in China, which has raised concerns among trade unionists that China will some day become a major exporter of chemicals as companies abandon industrialized countries and their workers. In 2002, the U.S. became a net importer of chemicals for the first time since the countrys chemical industry was developed.  The result, according to PACE, will be dependence on China for chemicals needed to sustain the overall economy and maintain national security.
 

In addition to the Dupont Spruance Management and Union documents we received below, an individual named George Sands has submitted to us a follow up to a Sierra Times article!  George specifically addresses human rights, specifically bisexuals, gays, lesbians, and the transgendered, and how multinational corporations, including DuPont and its B-GLAD, are following an agenda and targeting the moral majority (like our Dupont 7 boys).  It's a must read, and we hope you do!
 
.:*~*:._.:*~*:._.:*~*:.
 

A Human Resources person from DuPont Spruance Plant gave copies of a Supervisory Resource Document, minutes of a meeting which took place between Union and Management (both addressing the Confederate southern flag issue) and the Grievance of Jimmy Jones to the Union.  We hope you find them as interesting as we do!
 
.:*~*:._.:*~*:._.:*~*:.
 

DuPont compares the Southern Confederate Flag to a swastika and pornography and calls it "a Matter of Respect" ....
 
.:*~*:._.:*~*:._.:*~*:.

 
 

Star of David

Jewish people will not remain silent any longer. DuPont has deliberately offended a very holy people with their words and deeds. DuPont, know that thousands of righteous Hebrew men died in service defending their ensign - called the "Confederate Flag."   We are enraged at your arrogance - that DuPont would dare compare the Nazi Swastika to the beloved Confederate ensign.
 
DuPont, your words have provoked Hebrew men to join the vigil in front of your factory protesting your immoral position and behavior.  Our blue and white Star of David ensign shall be at your gate!
 
 
 

Star of David flag at 02/05/04 Dupont 7 vigil
Star of David flag at 02/05/04 Dupont 7 vigil

Judah Philip Benjamin was a Yale educated lawyer, he was elected to the U.S. Senate in 1852.  He was appointed Attorney General of the Confederacy and held the offices of Secretary of War and Secretary of State under the Confederacy.  Judah Benjamin's likeness was on Confederate currency.  He was Jewish.  Transnational corporation E.I. du Pont de Nemours compared Secretary Benjamin's Confederate Flag to the Nazi swastika, pornography and continues to hold that position.
 
.:*~*:._.:*~*:._.:*~*:.

DuPont Quiz
  • Which well known DuPont Spruance Plant woman has openly expressed indignation and outrage, verbally condemned the Confederate Flag and senior dedicated employees, but apparently has forgotten she was photographed after she lost a wet T-shirt contest in front of nearly 50 men in a Richmond nightspot restaurant?

.
.
.
.
.
We believe
DuPont's behavior is based on a lie.

For three years seven employees and scores of men and women maintained a high profile protest vigil in front of the Dupont Plant on Jefferson Davis Highway in Richmond, Virginia.  

.:*~*:._.:*~*:._.:*~*:.

Timeline of Events:

July 9, 2000  Mr. Jimmy Jones, a 30 year employee with DuPont, was called into his supervisor's office and told that he was forbidden to wear a shirt showing southern emblems and was ordered not to wear anything showing the Confederate flag. Jimmy was ordered to remove his T-shirt, a mug showing a Confederate emblem, the religious Cross of Saint Andew, the Apostle of Jesus the Christ, and a book containing information about his southern ancestors. The Confederate Flag, the Cross of St. Andrew, and emblems on cars and delivery trucks are also banned from the DuPont property.

August 9, 2000   The DuPont Employee Union presented Grievance #8-P00 to DuPont management claiming DuPont is biased and inconsistent with their edicts. DuPont ignored the Employee Union Grievance and refuses to acknowledge or hear the grievance.

 

1. A DuPont network organization, reflecting African heritage is encouraged and embraced by DuPont. African emblems are not banned on DuPont property.

African Flag

 

2. Within DuPont corporation resides a separate organization called B-GLAD.  It stands for:  Bisexual, Gay, Lesbian, Transgendered and Allied at DuPont.  By its nature and behavior, we define it as a secret membership organization with far reaching, powerful political agendas within transnational DuPont corporation.  Powerful homosexual organizations operate within all transnational corporations and may to some extent establish and dictate their corporate agenda policy.  B-GLAD organization sells a B-GLAD jewelry pin for members to wear on their clothes.  The B-GLAD homosexual rainbow flag is encouraged, embraced and welcomed on DuPont property and grounds.  B-GLAD's telephone number is listed at DuPont's headquarters in Wilmington, DE.  Apparently, homosexual lifestyle is encouraged by DuPont.

B-GLAD pin

B-GLAD Flag
DUPONT RAINBOW FLAG

http://www.dupontbglad.com/Links/links.html

PLEASE NOTE!  BGLAD believes the following websites contain valuable information on bisexual, gay, lesbian and transgender issues, but acknowledges that some people may find the materials offensive.  If you feel that the content may offend you, or if you are viewing this site from inside a corporate firewall and are concerned that viewing these materials may contravene corporate guidelines on internet usage, we recommend that you do not click on any of the links.

Links endorsed by DuPont B-GLAD (click on them!):

* * *
 

Jeff Gordon

Jeff Gordon & The "Rainbow" Warriors
DUPONT'S JEFF GORDON & THE "RAINBOW" WARRIORS

.
.
.
.

Richmond Light Infantry Blues

DuPont management said the Richmond Light Infantry Blue's Flag was despicable and banned it from their property.  The proud, honorable Richmond Light Infantry Blues were Virginia's oldest and Richmond's most distinguished company.  Formed as a militia unit in 1789, shortly after and geographically near where Patrick Henry gave his famous Liberty or Death speech; they received their nickname upon adoption of blue uniforms in 1793. The company was in continuous existence through World War II and is today considered the direct ancestor of the Virginia Army National Guard 1st Battalion, 183rd Infantry.  Virginia men died from 1789 defending their flag, but DuPont embraced the B-GLAD homosexual Rainbow Flag and banned Richmond Light Infantry Blue's 1862 Flag calling it despicable.

 
 
3. A DuPont network organization for Hispanic employees is embraced and encouraged by DuPont Management. Hispanic Flags and emblems are not banned on DuPont property.

Nicaraguan Flag

 

 .:*~*:._.:*~*:._.:*~*:.

A Fair Rule or Just Politically Correct?:

Saddam Hussein brutally murdered a million people, including Americans, but DuPont did not ban the IRAQI FLAG during the 30 year period when he was in power; 
 
President Bashar Al-assad's SYRIAN FLAG has not been banned by DuPont;
 
FÅhrer Adolf Hitler's murdered 6,000,000 Jews, but his Nazi party GERMAN twisted cross Swastika FLAG has not been banned by DuPont, nor have other German Flags;
 
President Mohammad-Reza Khatami's IRANIAN FLAG has not been banned by DuPont; nor have other Iranian Flags under Past-President Khomeini, who held Americans hostage at the American Embassy, been banned by DuPont;   
 
Revolutionary leader Muammar Qaddafi's LIBYAN FLAG has not been banned by DuPont. The United States bombed his country, but DuPont did not ban his flag;
 
President Dr. Fidel Castro's communist CUBAN FLAG enslaved his citizens, but has not been banned by DuPont.  World War III almost started over military missiles in Cuba, but DuPont didn't ban his flag;
 
President Abdelaziz Bouteflika's ALGERIAN FLAG has not been banned by DuPont;
 
President Kim Dae-jung murdered 500,000 people, but DuPont has not banned the NORTH KOREAN FLAG;
 
President Idi Amin Dada Oumee, the 'Butcher of Africa,' murdered 100,000 people, but DuPont has not banned his UGANDAN FLAG;
 
President Ho Chi Minh killed over 80,000 Americans during the Vietnam War, but DuPont has not banned the NORTH VIETNAM FLAG; 
 
Francois "Papa Doc" Duvalier and son, Jean-Claude (Baby Doc) Duvalier, dominated Haiti, the poorest nation in the Western Hemisphere, through a combination of brutality, intimidation and guile. They murdered thousands of their people, but DuPont has not banned their HAITIAN FLAG.
 
The Christian Cross of St. Andrew, the SOUTHERN FLAG, is the only flag since 1802 banned by worldwide  transnational E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company - also known as DuPont.
 
Ask why.
 
.:*~*:._.:*~*:._.:*~*:.

September 14, 2000  DuPont sends out a memo specifically banning Confederate emblems from Company property. The 7th paragraph of this memo states: "Purpose of this communication is to eliminate any question or reservation regarding the appropriateness of the display of the Confederate flag. Management must understand that displaying the Confederate flag on plant property is prohibited and a violation of our standards of a respectful work environment."
 
.:*~*:._.:*~*:._.:*~*:.

H.K. Edgerton

H.K. Edgerton: "Respectful indeed! It is my religious symbol, my Cross of St. Andrew Flag.  We believe DuPont's behavior is based on a lie."

H.K. is walking from Littleton, North Carolina to Richmond, Virginia starting on Monday May 17, 2004, carrying his beloved Southern Flag and armed with educational literature.  "In Richmond, Virginia the DuPont Company has banned Confederate symbols from their plant and have ignored requests to honor Confederate soldiers buried on their property, and this in the former Capital City of the Confederate States of America," explained Edgerton.  "DuPont employees have been staging a weekly vigil in front of the plant for the past 4 years that has been completely blacked out of the media - I intend to change that," Edgerton added.  Please help him.

.:*~*:._.:*~*:._.:*~*:.

DuPont's Richmond Plant is built on the site of the ancient Amphill Plantation where hundreds of southern ancestors are sleeping, buried in DuPont's ground.  DuPont owns the cemetery and controls everything about those dear people.  Brothers Robert Gilliam Temple and Peter Chevallie Temple are sleeping there.  Lt. Robert Gilliam Temple was a brave and honorable 24 year old Confederate Officer and served with the 39th Virginia Cavalry until his death in 1864. Now DuPont controls their bodies and graves.
 
His brother Peter Chevallie Temple was a 19 year old student at Virginia Military Institute in 1864.

THE BATTLE OF NEW MARKET

http://www.vmi.edu/archives/Civil_War/nmcouper.html

The VMI Cadets were children between the ages of 16 and 21 years old and in 1864 they were needed for battle at a place called New Market.

"The cadets were awakened at VMI by the long-roll on the night of May 10th, and 247 cadets were ordered to get their school guns and march early the next morning on the road to Staunton. 247 children marched in mud along the road and slept in the drenching rain for three days and nights to confront the enemy to defend their land. The 247 cadets and the southern forces were outnumbered by 2,000 men.

On Sunday, May l5th, about 1 a. m., a pitch-dark and rainy night, the cadets were quietly aroused, and after a prayer to their God by Capt. Frank Preston, B Co., the corps commenced its march to the battle-field; but it did not reach the vicinity of New Market until some time after sun-rise, because of one or more protracted stops.

They came under heavy fire. When the heavy artillery fire ceased, the command was given to the VMI corps to charge. This order was obeyed, not only with alacrity, but with enthusiasm; "and though the company organizations were gone, yet they rallied round their flag and formed some sort of a line as they advanced." So eager were the cadets to charge the enemy, 100 or 150 yards off, that it was difficult for them to find time to load and shoot their old-fashioned muzzle loading muskets This, the final charge, commenced in the wheat field, then a field of mud, just north of the Bushong Orchard, and continued for some distance north towards the Pike bridge over the Shenandoah.

Although outnumbered by 2,000 men, they routed the northern army. The pursuit of the retreating army by the cadets continued until the corps "was halted by order of General Breckinridge." Nine children cadets died but their dear flag, the Cross of Saint Andrew remained.

DuPont has refused to allow the Sons of Confederate Veterans to place Confederate Cross of Saint Andrew Battle Flags on their graves. One DuPont manager said the Cross of Saint Andrew flag was despicable, and that same DuPont manager was seen stepping on the Confederate Flag and grinding it into the dirt.  

September 18, 2000   A co-worker handed Jimmy Jones a copy of a Richmond Times-Dispatch newspaper article announcing a Civil War reenactment that was scheduled the following weekend. Jimmy's supervisor ordered the newspaper containing the article about the 1862 reenactment removed from plant property. He was then escorted to his truck and told to cover all Confederate emblems on his vehicle. Jimmy responded by placing a new sign on his truck with the message "DuPont violated my first amendment rights."  He was ordered to remove his 'freedom of speech' sign as well.

September 22, 2000  A "Supervisory Resource Tool" document was distributed to DuPont Management from Arlene J. Williams. The document contains 23 "frequently asked questions" relating to the Confederate flag or emblems and was designed to help deal with employees who violate the new DuPont transnational corporation anti-southern flag and emblem policies.

September 28, 2000  Mr. Donnie E. Irvine, the Union Grievance committee chairman, received  a letter from F.I. Poffinberger, the DuPont Nomex manufacturing Plant Manager, denying the Union grievance. Again, they would not acknowledge or listen.  

.:*~*:._.:*~*:._.:*~*:.

The Lawsuit:

The Southern Legal Resource Center in North Carolina agreed to represent the aggrieved employees. The SLRC approached the EEOC, alleging discrimination based on race, religion and national origin: Christian Confederate Southern-American. The EEOC refuses to proceed on the employees behalf and issues a right to sue letter.

The law requires the SLRC to hire local legal counsel in Richmond.  After many telephone calls, Richmond civil rights attorney Thomas Roberts agrees to help.

May 30, 2003   Suit filed in Federal Court. Personal pressure was put on Richmond attorney Roberts by DuPont.  Roberts talked of withdrawing from the case.

September 11, 2003   Roberts served (but did not file) a Motion to Withdraw as local counsel.

North Carolina Attorney Kirk Lyons of SLRC files a response to the Motion to Withdraw.  It asks that Roberts remain in the case until the inevitable DuPont Motion to Dismiss is filed and responded to because, without local counsel, the SLRC cannot file a response. Upon calling the Clerk to make sure SLRC's response to the Motion to Withdraw was filed, the Clerk informs Mr. Lyons that no Motion to Withdraw had been filed.  Mr. Lyons calls Roberts, but gets no response. 

September 17, 2003   Roberts proceeds to file the Amended Complaint and serves DuPont on September 22.  Without any notice to Mr. Lyons, the SLRC, or his clients (!), Roberts files his Motion to Withdraw as local counsel.

With no notice to the clients and, more importantly, no hearing, the Court allows Roberts to withdraw and orders Mr. Lyons to be "expeditious" in finding new local counsel.

Mr. Lyons begins by calling every Richmond area American Trial Lawyers Association member to find new local counsel.  

October 16, 2003  The SLRC receives DuPont's Motion to Dismiss.

October 17, 2003   The SLRC receives a letter from DuPont's counsel threatening sanctions against Mr. Lyons, personally, if the lawsuit is not dismissed within 21 days.  Sanctions under Rule 11 is punishment meted out to attorney's who file "frivolous" lawsuits.  The punishment is usually to pay the other side's legal bill for having to defend against it.

November 7, 2003   The 21 days passes.  Mr. Lyons tells the besieging DuPont forces "NUTS," to their invitation for him to surrender.  True to their promise DuPont files Rule 11 Sanctions personally against Mr. Lyons.   One of DuPont's goals in filing sanctions is to effectively scare off any local attorney from helping the clients.  For this DuPont's attorney's should be sanctioned!   DuPont also hopes to have the case dismissed by default.  After the sanctions threat it became impossible for Mr. Lyons to find local Richmond counsel.  Some attorneys even laughed in fear of DuPont. DuPont makes it clear that they will sanction ANY attorney that signs on with the SLRC and comes against DuPont.

The Court, realizing that a severe due process problem is looming, makes an attempt to get two different attorney's involved as local counsel.  Both attorneys are afraid and refused.  

November 17, 2003   The Court then takes the unprecedented step of allowing Mr. Lyons to practice in the case without local Richmond counsel!

November 24, 2003   Client's response to the Motion to Dismiss is officially filed, as well as Mr. Lyons' response to DuPont's sanctions. 

November 25, 2003   The Court dismisses the case!  It indicates it is also seriously considering imposing sanctions against Mr. Lyons!  It orders more briefing on several points, the question being not if sanctions will be imposed, but how much!

After its cavalier dismissal of the lawsuit, the Court does graciously indicate it will grant a hearing on the sanctions against Mr. Lyons!

December 5, 2003   The SLRC and Mr. Lyons file a Motion for Reconsideration on the Motion to Dismiss, alluding to several factual errors in the Judge's Memorandum of Dismissal and the requested additional briefing on sanctions. The Federal Judge in Richmond is apparently not listening and apparently will not hear the case.  He is obviously aware DuPont's attorneys are using forceful bullish tactics against the aggrieved employee's attorneys.

January 15, 2004  Incredibly, the court denies Mr. Lyons' Motion to Reconsider and orders DuPont to file by January 20 a motion for fees and costs to be assessed against the Dupont 7!  Mr. Lyons' will have until January 23 to respond and
DuPont then has until January 28 to reply. 

Friday, January 30, 2004 at 2:00 p.m.  Oral arguments are scheduled on January 30th at the Federal Courthouse. 

THIS JUST IN:  DuPont is seeking $59,989.49 in fees and $2,240.25 in expenses.  DuPont contends the primary burden should fall upon Mr. Lyons, but they are also going after the Dupont 7. 
 
The SLRC's final response prior to the Friday, January 30, 2004 hearing and oral arguments.
 
Friday, January 30, 2004  -  Hearing / Oral arguments.  DuPont asked for $61,000 in attorney's fees and costs against the Dupont 7 and Mr. Lyons, personally.  DuPont's fees are as follows:
1. Investigate original complaint allegations -
                    43.9 hours  $6,376.26
2. Preparation of Motion to Dismiss -
                   63.9 hours   $9,096.20
3. Preparation of Motion to Dismiss Reply Bried -
                   33.9 hours   $4,483.50
4.  Preparation of Motion for Sanctions -
                   48.9 hours   $7,979.30
5. Preparation of Reply Brief on Sanctions -
                   55.3 hours   $8,816.42
6. Analysis of Amended Complaint -
                   12.9 Hours  $2,255.50
7. Plaintiff's Pro Se briefs and local counsel issues -
                   24.8 hours   $4,391.02
8. Preparation of Response to motion for reconsideration -
                   60.3 hours   $9,410.72
9. Preparation of fee application -
                   60.3 hours   $9,410.14
Total:      393.0 hours   .....................    $61, 550.14

DuPont had five lawyers and one paralegal asking for fees ranging from $205 - $121 per hour with $75 per hour paralegal.  In addition, DuPont sought $2,240.25 in costs.
 
The Clerk's office on the 3rd floor of the courthouse is Jefferson Davis' old office.  Mr. Lyons arrived early and prepared further in the 4th Circuit library located in the same building and where there is an enormous mural of Jeb Stuart and his men. 
 
We are told the three DuPont lawyers, their staff and Ms. Linda Derr, Human Resources Manager, "arrived all cocky, stand-offish and arrogant, expecting an easy win." 
 
The following is from a memo written by Mr. H.K. Edgerton:
 
"The Judge opened the proceeding by considering the motion for sanctions. Jim Crockett of West Virginia opened for DuPont. The Judge immediately told him that he had read every single brief written and need no education on the law.  He then proceeded to fire hard question after pointed question at Crockett - DuPont didn't know what hit them. They were expecting a sanctions walk-over and the Judge wasn't having it.

Then Mr. Lyons got up to speak.  You couldn't hear a pin drop.  He was brilliant.   I think everyone in the courtroom was moved by his eloquent defense of the SLCRC's lawsuit against DuPont, his struggle to find local counsel among the cowardly Richmond bar and how he had no choice but to have his clients sign the Motion to Dismiss because, with no local counsel, if the client's didn't sign on their own, the case would be dismissed.  The Judge admonished Mr. Lyons for not making a Motion to waive the local rule earlier so the client's wouldn't have to sign pro se.  Mr. Lyons quickly retorted : "Your Honor I couldn't even file for a waiver, under the local rules I can file NOTHING without local counsel signing - so how could I file the waiver?"  The Court saw his point and quickly agreed.  He refused to impose sanctions on this point.

The Judge also made it clear that the SLRC's Terrill case - the first Confederate Southern American case - which the 4th Circuit had turned down - could not be used as precedent because it was an unpublished decision.  DuPont had claimed that Mr. Lyons should be sanctioned because Terrill being dismissed was binding precedent - controlling law - in the 4th Circuit (which includes Virginia) and that by filing against DuPont AFTER the Terrill decision - Mr. Lyons should be sanctioned for filing a frivolous lawsuit.  The Judge said "No!"  No sanctions were imposed.  Because no sanctions were imposed and apparently because the 4th Circuit caselaw forbids it - $20,000 of DuPont's fees sought against Mr. Lyons and the Dupont 7 was wiped away (WE HOPE).

Next, the Court took up the issue of attorney fees against the Dupont 7. DuPont's Niall Paul got up to argue for DuPont - his family was there to observe why the lawsuit against DuPont was frivolous and why the Dupont 7 should pay all five of their high dollar lawyers. 
The Judge asked Paul if the lawsuit was facially frivolous.  "Yes," Paul replied. "Then why did it take you 250 hours of attorney time to find that out?," Judge Hudson retorted.  Paul fumbled his answer, and looked like deer in headlights.

Then Mr. Lyons got up. "Your Honor," he began, "$61,000 in attorney fees is the best evidence that this was not a frivolous lawsuit! This lawsuit reminds me of what Winston Churchill said in reply to Hitler's claim that he would 'wring England's neck like a chicken!' Churchill replied, 'Some neck!'  ..... Some Chicken." The gallery tittered on both sides.

Mr. Lyons then launched into an eloquent defense of the SLRC's mission to use the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to broaden the scope of national origin, to change the law, to widen judicial interpretation to include Confederate Southern Americans. His remarks to the Judge were brilliant and I have never been prouder of my friend and brother.  The Judge was visibly moved - called Mr. Lyons "an honorable man that he has the highest respect for" and said that the Dupont 7 had the absolute right to use the courts to try to broaden or change the law.
 
BUT --------- DuPont was still the prevailing party and the Judge reluctantly agreed with DuPont that some fees would have to be paid;

BUT --------- He further stated that the law commanded that he take into account the Dupont 7's ability to pay, and that he would render an opinion in a week.

Everyone on our side of the courtroom feels that the Judge will be fair. I have never been more impressed with a US District Court Judge - and I know several.

Mr. Lyons manfully got up and told the Judge that the Dupont 7 had done nothing wrong to deserve attorneys' fees assessed against them, and that if fees must be imposed - impose them on him, personally.

So was it a victory?  Yes, I think it definitely was.  But it was a qualified victory.  We were spared disaster.  Mr. Lyons with the pressure of sanctions, fatigue and all the SLRC & personal financial problems and pressures weighing him down, performed brilliantly and put the SLRC back in the game.

BUT --------- We are a long way from a touchdown - we are still playing defense and it is up to all of us to help so that we can score! We were woefully underfunded for fighting hardball with DuPont - and DuPont is showing us how corporate America will fight our struggle for civil rights from here on. God helped us this time -but we must raise more funds for the trench-fighting that is to come! If we don't, DuPont will eventually win and, if the community fails us, will deserve to win!!!

Some attorneys' fees will be assessed.  I think the Judge will be fair. However, if we can't get a stay or a bond to guarantee the payment of the fees, we will not be able to appeal.  If no appeal and thus no lawsuit, the DuPont 7 will be at DuPont's mercy -y'all know how that will work (oh no - we're not firing you because you sued us 2 years ago, we're firing you because you were late getting back from your coffee break by 26 seconds).  I'M NO LAWYER, BUT I THINK WE MUST APPEAL!"
 
.:*~*:._.:*~*:._.:*~*:.

Another Interesting Lawsuit:

Mrs. Portia Bass, a black woman employee of DuPont, filed charges against E.I. du Pont de Nemours, Inc. charging discrimination after she was terminated from her job. The Court dismissed her case and ordered Mrs. Bass to pay DuPont's court costs and legal fees. DuPont submitted a bill of $21,937.39.  The court cut this figure in half based on  Bass' ability to pay. The Court also sanctioned  Bass' attorney for $1,000, which means her attorney was financially penalized for bringing the case to Court to challenge DuPont!   Seeing that DuPont has gone after plaintiff attorneys before, it will be interesting to speculate how much a DuPont attorney's time is worth when the sanctions are against Mr. Lyons in the Dupont 7 case.   We will report on January 20, when DuPont presents its bill.
 
.:*~*:._.:*~*:._.:*~*:.
 

The Hypocrisy of DuPont Corporation:

Alfred I. du Pont invested money is available today to support the name of Robert E. Lee, Thomas "Stonewall" Jackson and Sons of Confederate Veterans, all directly associated with the Confederate Flag banned from their property by E.I. du Pont de Nemours.

Southern Flag flown 10/10/03 at Dupont 7 vigil

 .:*~*:._.:*~*:._.:*~*:.

Translation:

What does E.I. du Pont de Nemours, Co mean? 

 .:*~*:._.:*~*:._.:*~*:.

About the Dupont 7:

One: I've worked for DuPont for 30 years.  My great great grandfather George W. Hutchison was a 1st Lt. in the 46th Va. Infantry (Company K) and served under General Wise.  His four brothers, Daniel Taney Hutchison, Martin Van Buren Hutchison, John Floyd Hutchison and James Jackson Hutchison, also served in the Civil War.  Love for my family's history was responsible for my association and membership in Sons of Confederate Veterans.  Because of my membership with a Confederate Civil War organization, DuPont managers called me a racist to my face.  DuPont managers ordered me to erase all signs of my association with my family's history and called my Southern Cross of St. Andrew  flag a living symbol of HATE, a filthy flag.

Two:  I worked for DuPont for 40 years.  My great grandfather Robert Lewis served in the 1st Va. Artillery during the first two years of the Civil War.  My great grandfather John Pocklington served as a ship's carpenter in the Confederate Navy at Rockett's Landing.  My wife's great uncle Jessie Williams served in the 56th Va. Infantry, was wounded at Gettysburg and sent to a Union prison at Ft. Delaware, N.J.  It is interesting to note that the plant manager, when asked early on what would happen if someone was accidentally shot or injured on the street where our vigil takes place (we often have bottles or other things thrown at us) every Thursday, stated .............."So be it."

ThreeI worked at DuPont for over 30 years.  My great grandfather Nathanial G. Jones served as a Sgt. in the 23rd Va. Infantry and again as a Pvt. in the 18th Va. Infantry.  He was wounded in his left shoulder as he charged across the field with 13,000 soldiers at the Battle of Gettysburg, then captured and sent to a Union prison at Davis Island, NY.  He was released and rejoined the army in Richmond, where he was captured at Hatcher's Run, southwest of Petersburg, and again sent to a Union prison at Pt. Lookout, MD, where he remained until the end of the Civil War. Years ago, I joined the Sons of Confederate Veterans organization and I placed a small southern flag emblem on the bumper of my car in respect for my relatives. Two years ago, my Dupont supervisor ordered me to remove or put black tape over my southern flag emblem on my automobile bumper. I was surprised to hear my supervisor threaten to fire me if I did not comply with his directive.  I complied and covered my flag with tape. A short time later, someone crashed into the back of my car bending the bumper under the car. The tape was torn and the emblem was facing down toward the road, under the car. The flag emblem could not be seen unless you viewed it from under the car. Apparently, the DuPont security guards called my supervisor and I was summoned and ordered to again put black tape over the flag emblem under the car. 

FourMy great grandfather on my mother's side was Andrew Alexander Giles, Private, Nelson Light Artillery (Lambkins artillery).  He was present at the bombardment of Fort Sumter and he enlisted shortly thereafter.  He was a brave Christian man and was wounded at the Battle of the Crater in Petersburg Va. and was buried at Blandford Church Cemetery close to where he received his mortal wounds. My relatives died defending their families, their homes, and fought under their sacred ensign called the Southern Cross, the Cross of St. Andrew, a reglious symbol. DuPont called the southern flag "despicable" but embraces the "Rainbow" homosexual flag as "respectable" in their workplace.  We are living a DuPont nightmare of archetypal dystopia in Aldous Huxley's Brave New World of "Newspeak."

Five:  Insert

Six:  Insert

Seven:  Insert

 
"Founded in 1802, DuPont's core values - integrity and high ethical standards - and treating people fairly and with respect,  regardless of ancestry, is the foundation on which every aspect of our business rests." --- DuPont

 .:*~*:._.:*~*:._.:*~*:.

What This Case Means To You:

 

First they came for the communists, and I did not speak out

--because I was not a communist;

Then they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out

--because I was not a socialist;

Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out

--because I was not a trade unionist;

Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out

-- because I was not a Jew;

Then they came for me

-- and there was no one left to speak out for me.

 

The men and women protesting on vigil in front of DuPont's plant in rain, sun and snow for three years are moral and principled people as were their ancestors.  "If you do not stand for something, then you stand for nothing - and then you die." The lives of all our great historical heros fondly remembered with love and affection conducted their lives in a certain way based on moral actions and principle.  We sadly find none or few of these moral characteristics in corporations today.  We do not believe DuPont displays Judeo-Christian tenets in their embrace of their secret membership, homosexual organization within DuPont's corporate umbrella.  We believe the flag issue is only the beginning of assignments to neutralize and alter human values, cleanse and rewrite history as we are led into the global transnational Brave New World of George Orwell's Big Brother, 1984.
 
.:*~*:._.:*~*:._.:*~*:.

The Vigil Continues:

We encourage Richmonders to join the vigil every Thursday at 3:30 p.m. in front of the DuPont Spruance Plant located at 5401 Jefferson Davis Highway, Chesterfield, Richmond, VA 23234.

.:*~*:._.:*~*:._.:*~*:.

How You Can Help:

Donate to The Southern Legal Resource Center ..... 

Southern Legal Resource Center
P.O. Box 1235
Black Mountain, NC 28711

Email: slrc@slrc-csa.org

Telephone: 828-669-5189

~ CLICK HERE ~

Pray for the DuPont 7.

Pray for the success of the SLRC and Mr. Lyons as he faces the prospect of sanctions for zealously advocating on behalf of his clients - the DuPont 7!

Counter: 19,777

1.   United States
2.   Canada
3.   England
4.   Ireland
5.   Scotland
6.   Israel
7.   Moldova, Republic of
8.   China
9.   Japan
10. Philippines
11, Germany
12. South Africa
13. Thailand 
14. Greece
15. Poland
16. Belgium
17. France
18. China
19. Netherlands
20. Chile
21.
Brazil
22. Sweden
23. Austria
24. Iran
25. Russia
26. Croatia
27. Saudi Arabia
28. Mexico
29. Portugal
30. Hungary
31. Australia
32. Italy
33. Malaysia
34. Nicaragua
35. Slovenia
36. European Union
37. Czechoslovakia (former)
38. Estonia
39. Latvia
40. Spain
41. Switzerland
42. Bahrain
43. Egypt
44. Norway
45. Ecuador
46. India
47. Singapore
48. Turkey
49. State of Qatar
 
 
 

 
Webmasters, please link to this site.